Global Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences
xxxx xxxx
Journal Menu
Home
Aim & Scope
Editorial Board
Archives
News
Abstracting & Indexing
Index Copernicus
Research Article | Volume: 1 Issue: 1 (Sep-Oct, 2025) | Pages 1 - 7
Prospective Observational Study on Drug-Related Issues in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coexisting Hypertension
1
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Medical College for Women & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2
Associate Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, Medical College for Women & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine, Medical College for Women and Hospital, Uttara, Dhaka, Bangladesh
4
Consultant (Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation), Brac Healthcare limited, Uttara Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh
5
Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine Medical College for Women and Hospital, Uttara, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Aug. 10, 2025
Revised
Aug. 25, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 9, 2025
Published
Sept. 15, 2025
Abstract

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a prevalent metabolic disorder that often coexists with hypertension, both of which can significantly impact the health outcomes of patients. Drug-related issues (DRIs) in this patient population are increasingly recognized as contributors to poor management of the diseases and adverse health events. However, systematic analyses of DRIs in T2DM patients with concurrent hypertension are limited.

Aim of the study: To explore the prevalence, types, and consequences of drug-related issues in patients with T2DM and coexisting hypertension, identifying key patterns and outcomes associated with pharmacotherapy in this cohort.

Methods: This study was a prospective observational investigation conducted over a six-month period at a multi-specialty hospital in Bengaluru. Data were collected from 100 adult patients diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Hypertension (HTN). The collected data included demographic information, clinical history, and medication records. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified and classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) and Hepler-Strand classifications.

Result: The mean age of the participants was 61.85±15.62 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution (51% males, 49% females). Monotherapy (39%) and dual therapy (34%) were the most common treatment regimens for T2DM, with insulin-only (39%) and insulin plus oral hypoglycemics (31%) being the predominant agents. Among antihypertensives, beta blockers (37%) and calcium channel blockers (31%) were most frequently prescribed. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified in 36% of patients, with "other" issues (39%), untreated indications (18%), and drug-drug interactions (15%) being the most prevalent. Factors such as smoking (63.33%) and alcohol consumption (67.89%) were significantly associated with a higher occurrence of DRPs, with a higher prevalence observed among females (58%) compared to males (38.64%).

Conclusion: Drug-related problems pose a significant challenge in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, emphasizing the importance of routine medication assessments and individualized interventions to enhance treatment effectiveness and patient outcomes.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN) are among the most common chronic non-communicable diseases globally. They frequently coexist and are considered major contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially when left inadequately managed [1]. T2DM is defined by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from insulin resistance and/or impaired insulin secretion, which leads to various complications involving multiple organ systems such as the eyes (retinopathy), kidneys (nephropathy), nerves (neuropathy), and cardiovascular system (atherosclerosis) [2]. HTN, typically defined as sustained blood pressure levels exceeding 140/90 mmHg, is a common comorbid condition in diabetic patients, with an estimated prevalence of 60–80% in individuals diagnosed with T2DM [3-4]. According to the International Diabetes Federation, in 2021, an estimated 537 million adults worldwide had diabetes, and this number is projected to increase to 643 million by 2030, and 783 million by 2045, driven by aging populations, urbanization, and lifestyle changes [5]. Bangladesh, referred to as the growing diabetes capital of the world, accounts for over 78 million diabetic individuals, with an adult prevalence rate of 6.9% [6]. The coexistence of T2DM and HTN significantly increases the risk of both microvascular and macrovascular complications and makes pharmacological management more challenging due to the requirement of multidrug regimens and close monitoring [7]. The frequent use of multiple medications in managing both conditions often results in polypharmacy, which in turn increases the likelihood of drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs encompass a wide range of issues, including adverse drug reactions (ADRs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), inappropriate dosing, medication non-adherence, and untreated or improperly treated indications [8]. These problems are associated with poor clinical outcomes, increased rates of hospitalization, prolonged hospital stays, and rising healthcare costs [9]. Risk factors that predispose patients to DRPs include advanced age, multiple comorbidities, impaired renal or hepatic function, and the use of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices [10]. Several studies have shown that DRPs are both prevalent and preventable, particularly in patients with coexisting chronic diseases like T2DM and HTN. In resource-constrained settings, where patient education and pharmacist-led interventions may be limited, the burden of DRPs is often more pronounced [11]. To address these issues systematically, validated tools such as the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification system and the Hepler-Strand model are used to identify, categorize, and resolve DRPs, improving patient safety and clinical outcomes [12-13]. Despite the rising burden of T2DM and HTN in Bangladesh, there is limited prospective data on the frequency, classification, and risk factors of DRPs in patients suffering from both conditions. Most available studies are retrospective or lack detailed assessments of drug utilization. This study aims to fill that gap by prospectively evaluating DRPs and identifying contributing factors and utilization patterns, thereby supporting improved pharmacotherapeutic practices and clinical decision-making.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at a multi-specialty hospital and research center in Dhaka, Bangladesh over a six month period. The study included a population of 100 participants that was designed to assess the clinical profile, management strategies, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with both Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with particular emphasis on hypertension and its related complications.

 

All of the patients were carefully observed to meet the research objectives and provide valuable insights within the specified timeframe. 

 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 30 years

  • Diagnosis of T2DM and hypertension

  • Diagnosis of CKD Stage 4 based on KDIGO 2021 criteria

  • On at least one oral antidiabetic drug or insulin and at least one antihypertensive agent

 

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or rapidly progressive renal failure

  • Pregnant or lactating women

  • Patients with incomplete or missing medical records

  • Patients with known malignancies or autoimmune renal disorders

 

Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations were integral to the study design and execution. The study adhered to ethical principles of confidentiality and privacy, ensuring that all patient data were anonymized and securely stored. Informed consent was obtained where applicable, and the research protocol was reviewed and approved by the relevant institutional ethics committee, ensuring compliance with ethical standards in human subject research.

 

Data Collection

Patients diagnosed with both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension were recruited from various inpatient departments within the hospital. A standardized data collection tool was used to capture relevant demographic and clinical information, including past medical history, lifestyle behaviors (such as tobacco use and alcohol consumption), associated risk factors, and diabetes-related complications (e.g., nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy). Drug-related problems (DRPs) including drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, and medication errors were evaluated using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification system version 9.0 and the Hepler-Strand classification framework. Medication usage patterns, such as monotherapy, dual, or triple therapy, were documented along with any reported adverse effects and observed drug interactions. Laboratory investigations were reviewed to assess glycemic control and blood pressure parameters, which were subsequently used to classify the status of diabetes and hypertension in each patient.

 

Statistical Analysis

The collected data were meticulously organized and recorded in Microsoft Excel, where descriptive statistical methods were employed for analysis. The outcomes were subsequently illustrated using graphical representations such as pie charts and bar graphs.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients diagnosed with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension were included in the study. The gender distribution was nearly equal, with 51% males and 49% females. The mean age of the participants was 61.85±15.62 years, with the largest group being in the 71–80-year range (28%), followed by 61–70 years (25%) and 51–60 years (21%) (Table 1). Ischemic heart disease (IHD) was the most prevalent comorbidity (27%), followed by urinary tract infections (UTI) (20%), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) (18%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (16%), and hyperthyroidism (6%). Most patients (60%) were admitted under the Department of General Medicine, with smaller numbers in Cardiology (27%) and Nephrology (7%). Smoking and alcohol use were underreported, with 23% documented smokers and 19% alcohol consumers. Glycemic control was suboptimal, with a mean HbA1c of 8.14±2.50%. A majority (37%) had HbA1c <7.1%, while 39% had missing documentation (Table 1). Regarding diabetes-related complications, 7% had foot ulcers, 4% had nephropathy, 3% had retinopathy, and 2% had neuropathy, with 84% showing no complications. Blood pressure measurements revealed 60% of patients were hypertensive, with 24% in Stage 1, 36% in Stage 2, and 7% in hypertensive crisis (Table 1). In table 2, drug utilization patterns indicated that 39% of patients received monotherapy for T2DM, 34% received dual therapy, and 13% received triple therapy (Table 2). The most common diabetic medications were insulin-only (39%) and oral hypoglycemics with insulin (31%). Metformin was most commonly used in monotherapy (7%), followed by Actrapid (29%). For hypertension, beta blockers (37%) and calcium channel blockers (31%) were the most frequently prescribed classes. In terms of drug-related problems (DRPs), "Others" was the most common issue (39%), followed by untreated indications (18%) and drug interactions (15%). Under the PCNE classification, no or incomplete treatment despite indications was found in 11% of patients (Table 3). The table 4 showed the factors influencing DRPs in T2DM and Hypertension patients. Smoking (63.33%) and alcohol consumption (67.89%) were associated with a higher occurrence of DRPs. Gender differences were also observed, with more females (58%) experiencing DRPs compared to males (38.64%).

 

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM and hypertension (N=100).

Variable

Group/Category

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Gender

Male

51

51

Female

49

49

Age Distribution

30-40

5

5

41-50

12

12

51-60

21

21

61-70

25

25

71-80

28

28

81-92

9

9

Age (Years)

Mean±SD

61.85±15.62

Comorbidities

Hyperthyroidism

6

6

Dyslipidemia

4

4

CHF

3

3

IHD

27

27

CKD

16

16

UTI

20

20

LRTI

18

18

Others

88

88

Department of Admission

General Medicine

60

60

Cardiology

27

27

Nephrology

7

7

Orthopedic

3

3

Surgery

3

3

Smoking Status

Smoker

23

23

Non-smoker

15

15

Not Mentioned

62

62

Alcoholic Status

Alcoholic

19

19

Non-alcoholic

29

29

Not Mentioned

62

62

Hba1c Levels

<5.9%

5

5

6-6.5 %

7

7

6.6-7%

12

12

<7.1%

37

37

Not Mentioned

39

39

Hba1c (%)

Mean±SD

8.14±2.50

Diabetic Complications

Retinopathy

3

3

Neuropathy

2

2

Nephrology

4

4

Foot ulcer

7

7

No Complications

84

84

Blood Pressure Stages

Normal

14

14

Prehypertension

19

19

Stage 1 HTN

24

24

Stage 2 HTN

36

36

Hypertensive Crisis

7

7

Blood Pressure (mmHg)

Mean±SD

146.8±22.27

 

Table 2: Drug utilization pattern in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Variable

Group/Category

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

No. of Drugs Prescribed for T2DM

Monotherapy

39

39

Dual Therapy

34

34

Triple Therapy

13

13

Type of Diabetic Medications

Only Oral

23

23

Only Insulin

39

39

Oral+Insulin

31

31

Monotherapy (Hypoglycemics)

Metformin

7

7

Vildagliptin

4

4

Linagliptin

5

5

Actrapid

29

29

Lantus

6

6

Dual Therapy (Hypoglycemics)

Vildagliptin+Metformin

11

11

Glimepiride+Metformin

9

9

Sitagliptin+Metformin

7

7

Sitagliptin+Dapagliflozin

2

2

Metformin+Actrapid

4

4

Metformin+Lantus

2

2

Actrapid+Lantus

8

8

Triple Therapy (Hypoglycemics)

Metformin+Voglibose+Glimepiride

5

5

Glimepiride+Metformin+Vildagliptin

9

9

Classes of Antihypertensives

Calcium Channel Blocker

31

31

Beta Blocker

37

37

ACE Inhibitor

2

2

ARB

14

14

Diuretics

5

5

Different Antihypertensive Medications

Amlodipine

16

16

Clinidipine

12

12

Bisoprolol

18

18

Carvedilol

5

5

Atenolel

1

1

Metoprolol

7

7

Verapamil

1

1

Enalapril

1

1

Ramipril

8

8

Telmisartan

11

11

Losartan

2

2

Furosemide

5

5

Combination Therapy for Antihypertensives

ARB+CCB

8

8

ARB+Diuretics

3

3

CCB+Beta Blocker

13

13

Beta Blocker+ACE Inhibitor

4

4

Diuretics+Beta Blocker

1

1

Diuretics+CCB

2

2

 

Table 3: Summary of drug-related problems in T2DM and HTN patients (N=100).

Category

Subcategory

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Helper-strand Classification

Drug Without Indication

2

2

Improper Drug Selection

1

1

Drug Interactions

15

15

Overdose

1

1

Adverse Drug Reaction

5

5

Untreated Indication

18

18

Others

39

39

PCNE Classification

Inappropriate Drugs (Contraindicated)

5

5

Drug Without Indication

1

1

Inappropriate Drug Combinations

7

7

No or Incomplete Treatment Despite Indications

11

11

Too Many Drugs for the Same Indication

1

1

Inappropriate Drug Form

2

2

Dosage Regimen Too Frequent

4

4

Dose Timing Unclear/Wrong

3

3

Wrong Drugs/Strength/Dosage Advised

3

3

Inappropriate Timing of Administration

3

3

 

Table 4: Factors influencing DRPs in T2DM and Hypertension patients.

Variable

Category

DRPs (%)

Non-DRPs (%)

Age (Years)

30-50

50

50

51-70

45.63

54.37

71 Years and Above

39.34

60.66

Gender

Male

38.64

61.36

Female

58

42

Smoking

Yes

63.33

36.67

No

43.33

56.67

Alcohol Consumption

Yes

67.89

32.11

No

44.48

55.52

 

DISCUSSION

This prospective observational study evaluated drug-related problems (DRPs) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coexisting hypertension, emphasizing demographic patterns, comorbid conditions, drug utilization, and risk factors contributing to DRPs. Our findings reinforce the complexity of managing polypharmacy in patients with multiple chronic conditions, in line with previous evidence indicating a high prevalence of DRPs among such populations. The mean age of our cohort was 61.85 ± 15.62 years, with the majority of patients aged between 61 and 80 years. This age group represents a vulnerable population prone to polypharmacy and pharmacokinetic alterations, predisposing them to adverse drug events and therapeutic inefficacies. A similar age distribution and its impact on polypharmacy have been reported in studies by Abukhalil et al. and Tigabu et al., where elderly patients with T2DM had a significantly higher risk of DRPs due to comorbidities and complex therapeutic regimens [14-15]. Our population had a near-equal gender distribution, yet DRPs were more frequently reported among females (58%) than males (38.64%). This observation aligns with findings from Wasilow-Mueller et al., who reported a higher incidence of DRPs in female patients, possibly due to differences in pharmacodynamics, healthcare-seeking behavior, and adherence patterns [16]. Cardiovascular comorbidities were highly prevalent, with ischemic heart disease (27%) and chronic kidney disease (16%) topping the list. These findings are consistent with other observational studies where IHD and CKD are dominant among patients with T2DM and hypertension, adding to the complexity of therapy management [17-18]. The co-occurrence of urinary and respiratory tract infections in 20% and 18% of patients, respectively, also reflects the immunocompromised state often observed in diabetic individuals. Glycemic control was suboptimal, with a mean HbA1c of 8.14 ± 2.50%. Only 5% of patients had HbA1c <5.9%, while a significant proportion (39%) lacked documented HbA1c values. This is concerning given the ADA-recommended target of <7% for most non-pregnant adults with T2DM [2]. Our findings are consistent with a multicenter study by Davies et al., where a significant proportion of patients failed to meet glycemic targets despite ongoing therapy, partly attributed to therapeutic inertia and lack of patient follow-up [19]. The antihypertensive regimen was dominated by beta-blockers (37%) and calcium channel blockers (31%), followed by ARBs (14%). Notably, ACE inhibitors were underutilized (2%), which contrasts with guidelines recommending ACEIs or ARBs as first-line agents in diabetic hypertensive patients due to their renoprotective effects [20]. A similar discrepancy was reported in a study by Niriayo et al., indicating suboptimal adherence to hypertension management guidelines in diabetic populations [21]. In terms of antidiabetic regimens, insulin-only therapy was most prevalent (39%), followed by combined oral and insulin regimens (31%). The use of insulin in a substantial number of patients suggests advanced or poorly controlled diabetes, which corresponds with the elevated HbA1c levels. This aligns with findings by Abushanab et al., where insulin use was associated with higher rates of DRPs due to its narrow therapeutic index and administration complexity [22]. Drug-related problems were prevalent in our study, with “untreated indications” (18%), “drug interactions” (15%), and “adverse drug reactions” (5%) being the most common, according to the Helper-Strand classification. Similar patterns were reported by Viktil et al., where untreated indications and interactions were among the leading causes of DRPs in multimorbid patients [8]. The PCNE classification further revealed gaps in therapy, such as “no or incomplete treatment despite indication” (11%) and “inappropriate drug combinations” (7%). Notably, lifestyle factors played a significant role. Smokers and alcohol consumers had markedly higher rates of DRPs (63.33% and 67.89%, respectively), highlighting the need for behavior-modifying interventions as part of chronic disease management. These findings are supported by studies from Cano et al. and Leendertse et al., which demonstrated a strong correlation between unhealthy lifestyle practices and increased DRP incidence [23-24]. Interestingly, younger patients (30–50 years) showed a 50% DRP incidence, while the oldest age group (>70 years) had the lowest (39.34%), contradicting the usual trend of age-associated increase in DRPs. This could reflect closer monitoring of elderly patients or underreporting in this subgroup, as suggested by Hanlon et al. [25]. Overall, the high burden of DRPs observed in this study underscores the urgent need for interdisciplinary approaches, including pharmacist-led medication reviews, integration of clinical decision support systems, and improved documentation practices. Optimizing therapy for T2DM and hypertension demands individualized care, vigilant monitoring, and strict adherence to evidence-based guidelines.

 

Limitations of the Study: Like most hospital-based investigations, this study is subject to certain limitations. The findings may not be generalizable to broader national or global populations due to the limited sample size and single-center design. The relatively small number of enrolled patients, compared to similar research, may affect the statistical power and the strength of conclusions drawn. The short study duration also posed challenges in assessing long-term complications and mortality outcomes. Furthermore, incomplete documentation in some patient records—particularly regarding lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol use—could have introduced bias into the data analysis. The six-month timeframe restricted the evaluation of the sustained impact of medications and the effectiveness of interventions to reduce drug-related problems (DRPs). Additionally, the exclusion of pregnant individuals and patients with incomplete data may have led to the omission of significant subpopulations, potentially limiting the overall scope and representativeness of the results.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the considerable prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN), highlighting the influence of demographic factors such as age and gender, along with lifestyle behaviors. Key challenges identified include polypharmacy and the use of inappropriate drug combinations, underscoring the importance of individualized pharmacological management. These findings offer valuable guidance for healthcare providers in optimizing medication use and enhancing clinical outcomes. Further research is warranted to develop and assess targeted interventions aimed at reducing the incidence of DRPs in similar patient populations.

 

Declarations

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

REFERENCES
  1. European Society of Cardiology. ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:3021-104.

  2. Care D. Standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes care. 2023;46:S1-267.

  3. Cheung BM, Li C. Diabetes and hypertension: is there a common metabolic pathway?. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2012 Apr;14:160-6.

  4. Sowers JR, Epstein M, Frohlich ED. Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: an update. Hypertension. 2001 Apr;37(4):1053-9.

  5. Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ, Atlas ID. What is diabetes?. InIDF DIABETES ATLAS [Internet]. 10th edition 2021. International Diabetes Federation.

  6. Akhtar S, Nasir JA, Sarwar A, Nasr N, Javed A, Majeed R, Salam MA, Billah B. Prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):e036086. 

  7. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. The lancet. 2005 Jan 15;365(9455):217-23.

  8. Viktil KK, Blix HS, Moger TA, Reikvam A. Polypharmacy as commonly defined is an indicator of limited value in the assessment of drug‐related problems. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2007 Feb;63(2):187-95.

  9. Ferrah N, Lovell JJ, Ibrahim JE. Systematic review of the prevalence of medication errors resulting in hospitalization and death of nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2017 Feb;65(2):433-42.

  10. Mekonnen AB, Alhawassi TM, McLachlan AJ, Brien JA. Adverse drug events and medication errors in African hospitals: a systematic review. Drugs-real world outcomes. 2018 Mar;5:1-24.

  11. Farha RA, Basheti I, Al Ruz HA, Alsaleh A, AbuRuz S. Assessment of drug-related problems and their impact on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2016 May 1;23(3):126-30.

  12. Allemann SS, van Mil JF, Botermann L, Berger K, Griese N, Hersberger KE. Pharmaceutical care: the PCNE definition 2013. International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2014 Jun;36:544-55.

  13. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. American journal of hospital pharmacy. 1990 Mar 1;47(3):533-43.

  14. Abukhalil AD, Amer NM, Musallam LY, Al-Shami NM. Medication error awareness among health care providers in Palestine: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional observational study. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2022 Apr 1;30(4):470-7. 

  15. Tigabu BM, Daba D, Habte B. Drug-related problems among medical ward patients in Jimma university specialized hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of research in pharmacy practice. 2014 Jan 1;3(1):1-5. 

  16. Wasilow-Mueller S, Erickson CK. Reviews: Drug abuse and dependency: Understanding gender differences in etiology and management. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996). 2001 Jan 1;41(1):78-90.

  17. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2017 Jun 1;128:40-50.

  18. Afkarian M, Sachs MC, Kestenbaum B, Hirsch IB, Tuttle KR, Himmelfarb J, de Boer IH. Kidney disease and increased mortality risk in type 2 diabetes. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2013 Feb 1;24(2):302-8. 

  19. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes care. 2018 Oct 5;41(12):2669. 

  20. Flack JM, Adekola B. Blood pressure and the new ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines. Trends in cardiovascular medicine. 2020 Apr 1;30(3):160-4. 

  21. Niriayo YL, Kumela K, Kassa TD, Angamo MT. Drug therapy problems and contributing factors in the management of heart failure patients in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. PloS one. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0206120. 

  22. Abushanab D, Atchan M, Elajez R, Elshafei M, Abdelbari A, Al Hail M, Abdulrouf PV, El-Kassem W, Ademi Z, Fadul A, Abdalla E. Economic impact of clinical pharmacist interventions in a general tertiary hospital in Qatar. PLoS One. 2023 Jun 1;18(6):e0286419. 

  23. Cano FG, Rozenfeld S. Adverse drug events in hospitals: a systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2009;25:S360-72. 

  24. Leendertse AJ, Egberts AC, Stoker LJ, van den Bemt PM, HARM Study Group. Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Archives of internal medicine. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1890-6. 

  25. Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Ruby CM, Weinberger M. Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001 Feb 1;49(2). 

 

Advertisement
Recommended Articles
Statistics
Impact Factor
0.0
Cite Score
0.0
Acceptance Rate
49%
Time to first decision
3-5 Days
Article received to acceptance
10-15 Days
Editor-In-Chief
Dr. XYZ
Ph.D
Professor
Flowbite Logo
Najmal Complex,
Opposite Farwaniya,
Kuwait.
Email: kuwait@iarcon.org

Editorial Office:
J.L Bhavan, Near Radison Blu Hotel,
Jalukbari, Guwahati-India
Useful Links
Order Hard Copy
Privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Refund Policy
Others
About Us
Contact Us
Online Payments
Join as Editor
Join as Reviewer
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Follow us
MOST SEARCHED KEYWORDS
Copyright © Global Scholars Publishers . All Rights Reserved.